Whole earth 4D: Reservoir monitoring geomechanics

PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2003Whole earth 4D: Reservoir monitoring geomechanicsAuthors: P. J. HatchellA. van den BeukelM. M. MolenaarK. P. MaronC. J. KenterJ. G. F. StammeijerJ. J. van der VeldeC. M. SayersP. J. HatchellShell International Exploration and Production — Rijswijk, A. van den BeukelShell International Exploration and Production — Rijswijk, M. M. MolenaarShell International Exploration and Production — Rijswijk, K. P. MaronShell International Exploration and Production — Rijswijk, C. J. KenterShell International Exploration and Production — Rijswijk, J. G. F. StammeijerShell Expro — Aberdeen, J. J. van der VeldeShell Expro — Aberdeen, and C. M. SayersShell Expro — Aberdeenhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817532 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817532FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDiagnostic Methods: Integrity Tests30 January 2023An Approach for Predicting the Effective Stress Field in Low-Permeability Reservoirs Based on Reservoir-Geomechanics Coupling24 March 2022 | Processes, Vol. 10, No. 4Time-lapse image registration by high-resolution time-shift scanXingye Liu, Xiaohong Chen, Min Bai, and Yangkang Chen8 April 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 3Quantitative Analysis of Geopressure for Geoscientists and Engineers10 February 2021 | , Vol. 74Mechanical properties of grain contacts in unconsolidated sandsColin M. Sayers10 March 2021 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 86, No. 2A Critical Comparison of Three Methods for Time-Lapse Time-Shift Calculation16 November 2019 | Mathematical Geosciences, Vol. 53, No. 1Review Paper: Methods of measurement for 4D seismic post‐stack time shifts24 September 2020 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 68, No. 9Towards integrated modeling of deformations, time-lapse seismic changes, and failure stresses caused by massive underground fluid operationsIvan Abakumov, Lisa Johann, Serge A. Shapiro, Elena Pasternak, and Arcady V. Dyskin30 September 2020Offset dependence of overburden time‐shifts from ultrasonic data21 May 2020 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 68, No. 6The effects of azimuthal anisotropy on 3D and 4D seismic amplitude variation with offset responsesLisa J. Gavin and David Lumley9 October 2019 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 84, No. 6Effect of Pore Pressure Depletion on Wellbore Stability and Hydraulic Fracturing in Sandstone Reservoir22 March 2019Review Paper: Post‐stack 4D seismic time‐shifts: Interpretation and evaluation10 December 2018 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 23Geophysical Monitoring of CO2 Injection at Citronelle Field, Alabama12 September 2018Review Paper: A semi-empirical model of strain sensitivity for 4D seismic interpretation5 June 2018 | Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 66, No. 73D modeling of geomechanical elastic properties in a carbonate-sandstone reservoir: a comparative study of geostatistical co-simulation methods2 May 2018 | Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4The geology of geomechanics: petroleum geomechanical engineering in field development planning28 June 2017 | Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Vol. 458, No. 1Offset-dependence of production-related 4D time shifts: Real data examples and modelingAsiya Kudarova, Paul Hatchell, Jonathan Brain, and Colin Macbeth1 September 2016Evaluation of the spurious time-shift problemColin Macbeth, Maria-Daphne Mangriotis, and Paul Hatchell1 September 2016Time-shift correction of towed streamer 4D seismic data for complex reservoirsZhen Zou1 September 2016Stress-induced signatures in 4D seismic data: Evidence of overburden stress archingAdrian Rodriguez-Herrera, Nick Koutsabeloulis, Atef Onaisi, Julien Fiore, and Federico Selva19 August 2015Standards in 4D feasibility and interpretationJ. G. F. Stammeijer and P. J. Hatchell5 February 2014 | The Leading Edge, Vol. 33, No. 2Investigation of the Effect of Rock Mechanical Properties and In-Situ Stresses on Seismic Velocity Through a Coupled Geomechanical Reservoir Model1 April 2010 | SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 02References21 March 2012Applying time-lapse seismic methods to reservoir management and field development planning at South Arne, Danish North Sea11 May 2022 | Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series, Vol. 7, No. 1Simultaneous multivintage time-shift estimationEhsan Zabihi Naeini, Henning Hoeber, Gordon Poole, and Hamid R. Siahkoohi1 September 2009 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 74, No. 5Linking reservoir geomechanics and time-lapse seismics: Predicting anisotropic velocity changes and seismic attributesJorg V. Herwanger and Steve A. Horne19 June 2009 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 74, No. 4An experimental study of the dilation factorArpita Pal Bathija, Michael Lee Batzle, and Manika Prasad26 June 2009 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 74, No. 4Predicting and monitoring long-term compaction in unconsolidated reservoir sands using a dual power law modelPaul N. Hagin and Mark D. Zoback26 July 2007 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 72, No. 5Asymmetry in the time-lapse seismic response to injection and depletionGeophysical Prospecting, Vol. 55, No. 5An experimental study of the dilation factor in sandstone under anisotropic stress conditionsArpita Pal‐Bathija and Mike Batzle14 September 20074D seismic signatures of North Sea chalk —The Dan fieldLars Gommesen, Thomas Dons, Hans P. Hansen, Jan Stammeijer, and Paul Hatchell14 September 2007Geomechanical stresses from 4D time shifts measured around the depleting Franklin and Elgin reservoirsKeith Hawkins, Sharon Howe, Steve Hollingworth, Graham Conroy, Lotfi Ben‐Brahim, Claire Tindle, Neville Taylor, Gregory Joffroy, and Atef Onaisi14 September 2007Assessment of time‐lapse seismic repeatability using repeated test lines at the Kristin fieldSvend Østmo, Anne‐Kari Furre, Olav R. Hansen, Ola Eiken, and Youness El Ouair14 September 2007Time‐lapse traveltime shifts above compacting reservoirs: 3D solutions for prestack dataRodrigo Felício Fuck, Andrey Bakulin, and Ilya Tsvankin14 September 2007Sensitivity of time-lapse seismic to reservoir stress pathGeophysical Prospecting, Vol. 54, No. 3Impact of fabric, microcracks and stress field on shale anisotropyGeophysical Journal International, Vol. 165, No. 1Estimation of production induced stress changes from 4D finite offset timeshiftsKeith Hawkins, Graham Conroy, and Peter Harris6 October 2006Time‐lapse seismic response to injection and depletionColin M. Sayers6 October 2006Seismic monitoring of pressure depletion evaluated using azimuthal AVO data?Faisal Al Kindi, Colin MacBeth, and Asghar Shams6 October 2006Seismic monitoring of pressure depletion evaluated for a United Kingdom continental-shelf gas reservoirGeophysical Prospecting, Vol. 54, No. 1Time-lapse seismic analysis of pressure depletion in the Southern Gas BasinGeophysical Prospecting, Vol. 54, No. 14D seismic for oil-rim monitoringGeophysical Prospecting, Vol. 53, No. 2Measuring reservoir compaction using time‐lapse timeshiftsP. J. Hatchell and S. J. Bourne7 December 2005Modelling seismic time‐lapse changes in the overburden and in the reservoir as a result of reservoir depletionPetar Vladov Angelov, Jesper Spetzler, Rob Arts, and Kees Wapenaar7 December 2005References21 March 2012Monitoring production‐induced stress changes using seismic wavesColin M. Sayers3 January 2005 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2003ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2003 Pages: 2452 publication data© 2003 Copyright © 2003 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION P. J. Hatchell, A. van den Beukel, M. M. Molenaar, K. P. Maron, C. J. Kenter, J. G. F. Stammeijer, J. J. van der Velde, and C. M. Sayers, (2003), "Whole earth 4D: Reservoir monitoring geomechanics," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1330-1333. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1817532 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...