The efficacy of high and low voltage electrical stimulation under different chilling regimes

Two experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy, in terms of beef quality, of low voltage (LV), high voltage (HV) and combined low and high voltage (LH) electrical stimulation under two chilling regimes (blast chilling, BC; conventional chilling, CC).In both experiments, regardless of the type of electrical stimulation, shear values were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in stimulated carcasses compared with non-stimulated control carcasses (CON). Despite the results of the objective measures of shear, taste panel data from exp. 1 indicated a preference for steaks from treatments subjected to high voltage stimulation (HV and LH; P < 0.01). Colour of the musculature in electrically stimulated carcasses was significantly lighter and brighter than CON carcasses in both experiments. However, in exp. 2, where LV was applied for 40 s, a small proportion (~ 10%) of the carcass sides exhibited a pale, soft, exudative condition. This was reflected in the significantly higher drip losses in the LH and LV treatments in exp. 2. Overall, these results indicate an advantage of HV over LV stimulation. Since high voltage stimulation resulted in improved objective measures of meat quality and improved palatability, its use can be recommended to Canadian packers.Under the blast chilling conditions employed in the present studies there were no significant interactive effects with electrical stimulation. Blast chilling resulted in a significant reduction in cooler shrink (P < 0.01), a darker meat colour (P < 0.01) and slightly higher shear force values. The small magnitude of the increase in shear force (approximately 0.3 kg) was not identified by the taste panel and is unlikely to be detected by consumers. Key words: Beef quality, high voltage, low voltage, electrical stimulation