Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy

Conclusions and Recommendations, are particularly interesting in view of the controversies aroused by the Warnock Report.Many of the recommendations contained here are similar to Warnock's (for example, concerning the legitimacy of AID children, the need for a licensing authority to supervise the work of AID and IVF centres, etc), but others are at odds with the corresponding Warnock recommendations.In general, the authors place higher value on the family as an institution than did the Warnock Committee and display a much livelier awareness of the possible social dangers of the new techniques.One weakness of the book is that since its authors are approaching these topics from the standpoint of social scientists, their recommendations for legislative action -which surely must be based on properly ethical considerations, not merely sociological onesseem devoid of any satisfactory rational support.For example, they concede that experimentation on human embryos is an objectionable practice, since 'the material acting as the subject of the experimentation is a human being at the beginning of its individual development' (p 178); but the practical recommendation which they make concerning this practice is disappointingly feeble: