Soft‐Tissue Interference Fixation: Bioabsorbable Screw Versus Metal Screw

Purpose To compare the biomechanical properties of eccentrically positioned bioabsorbable and titanium interference screws for quadrupled hamstring tendon graft (QHTG) fixation. Type of Study In vitro, biomechanical study. Methods In 10 paired cadaveric tibiae and femurs (mean age, 66.5 years; range, 53 to 81 years), QHTG fixation was performed in tunnels sized to within 0.5 mm of QHTG diameter using either a titanium (RCI; Smith & Nephew Donjoy, Carlsbad, CA) or a bioabsorbable (BioScrew; Linvatec, Largo, FL) screw of equal size. Constructs then underwent biomechanical load‐to‐failure testing on a servo‐hydraulic device at 20 mm/min. Results Load at failure was greater for femoral‐side QHTG fixation using the bioabsorbable screw than the titanium screw (486 ± 223.7 N v 246 ± 99.1 N, P = .006); however, displacement did not differ ( P = .81). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for tibial side load at failure ( P = .54), stiffness ( P = .44), or displacement ( P = .50). Screw thread‐induced graft laceration was more frequently observed in the titanium screw group (9 of 10 grafts during femoral‐side testing, 0 of 10 grafts during tibial‐side testing) than in the bioabsorbable screw group (0 of 10 grafts during femoral‐side testing, 1 of 10 grafts during tibial‐side testing). Conclusions BioScrew interference screw fixation was comparable or superior to RCI titanium interference screw fixation. BioScrew interference screw fixation also produced less screw thread‐induced laceration of the QHTG during load‐to‐failure testing. Clinical Relevance Use of a biodegradable interference screw positioned directly against a soft‐tisse graft provides fixation properties similar to those of a metal interference screw.