Search for a command to run...
The influence of soil C stabilization mechanisms is normally not considered in studies on the effects of land use changes. Instead, observed changes are typically explained by differences in litter input. As a result, it is not well known if and how quickly newly incorporated C is stabilized in soils. Our goals were to find out how much soil C was stabilized in two different soil orders (Andisols and Inceptisols) and which are the responsible mechanisms of C stabilization. Furthermore, we looked for evidence that newly incorporated soil C was stabilized in these contrasting soil orders. We selected 25 sites in northwestern Ecuador with two paired plots per site: one plot where pasture was converted to secondary forest and one plot where forest was converted to pasture. In all the plots, soil C content, stocks, and stable isotope (δ 13 C) signal were measured in the surface soil. The δ 13 C values were used to estimate the stocks of soil C derived from forest (Cdf) and from pasture (Cdp) in all plots. We calculated correlations between these stocks and soil and environmental characteristics to identify mechanisms of soil C stabilization. Our results show that long‐term stabilization in Andisols was through formation of metal–humus complexes and allophane, while in Inceptisols long‐term stabilization was through sorption to clay minerals. We found evidence that recently incorporated C was not stabilized in Andisols, while in Inceptisols, poorly crystalline (hydr‐) oxides seemed to have stabilized part of this soil C. We conclude that unless soil C stabilizing mechanisms are explicitly considered, we will not be able to predict the direction and magnitude of changes in soil C stocks following land use changes in the tropics.
Published in: Soil Science Society of America Journal
Volume 69, Issue 4, pp. 1110-1117