Search for a command to run...
Present an Overview of Available Options for Gas Monetization Offshore at the "OTC Houston 2017" Conference. The ups and downs of the gas prices associated to the oil glut and the increasing strength of the environmental regulations, the adherence to green aspects of daily living, drastic changes in the world weather due to global warming and the growing respect of nature, make increasingly more difficult, less friendly and less convenient to flare. This presents a big challenge and an opportunity to increase the study and design activities for implementation of alternative gas utilization processes for application onshore and offshore, with particular interest in the later, especially in remote locations of the world. Gas reinjection and transportation by pipelines are the main methods of gas handling as flaring is opposed by governments and the civil society. Reinjection is costly and not always needed and pipelines for long distances could become uneconomical. The alternative gas handling methods to be summarized in this paper will be floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG), Floating Gas To Liquids (FGTL), floating Methanol (FML), other gas conversion processes and Floating Power Generation or Gas to Wire (FGTW), addressing technologies and processes other than the traditional options, which would enhance the feasibility and enable oil and gas projects in remote areas. This paper will briefly indicate various other alternatives such as Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Gas-to-Hydrates (GTH), and Gas to ammonia/methanol/DME but will not be formally presented. An evaluation will be made of the gas handling alternatives with regards to: feasibility for remote areas, the technology readiness level (TRL), relative footprint, weights and CAPEX for each alternative. Several of the options would allow the gas to be transformed into a liquid that could be transported by ship or even spiked into the crude oil for transportation. The transportability of the alternative products in remote areas could alleviate overcoming the challenging distances to the ultimate markets. Other options would allow monetizing the gas at site providing useful product consumption by nearby projects, e.g. GTW or GTL. The paper will describe the value chain of each alternative and describe it including existing and near term applications, technologies utilized, current efforts to improve, highlighting how the project could be enhanced or even enabled. The necessary further work to bring the technology to fruition will be discussed along with an overview of the current and future gas handling options; a comprehensive evaluation of the TRL, harsh environment inland and offshore cost and impact on projects; and recommended gas handling alternatives for proposed projects.