Search for a command to run...
Most people change their values over the course of their lives, and do so via the distinctive kind of agency that Agnes Callard calls ‘aspiration’. For example, Gina, a college student, wonders whether she should take an elective on music appreciation. Currently, she does not value listening to classical music very much. She has, however, caught glimpses of its value such that she is discontented with her current motivations. She hopes that there is something valuable to gain by taking the course even though she does not know what it is; if she knew, she would already value the thing that she inchoately seeks to value. She signs up. Gina's signing up for the class does not mark her aspirational beginning. Rather, the learning process of aspiration is well underway at this point, and her signing up is a further mark of her agency in the process. Callard's book is a defence of aspiration's rationality, and it is well written, original, and interesting. She explores the way in which our current thinking about practical rationality, moral psychology, and moral responsibility (the three ethical subdivisions of her book) would have to be revised to make room for aspiration.