Search for a command to run...
Abstract Although the effects of species richness on ecosystem functioning have been extensively studied, there is increased interest in understanding how community assembly in general might alter the functioning of ecosystems. We focus on two complementary approaches for evaluating how community assembly influences ecosystem function (here, productivity). The first quantifies the relative importance of complementarity and selection by contrasting monocultures with polycultures. The second identifies the effects of species losses and/or gains relative to the baseline polyculture, as well as the indirect effects on other species’ productivity. We evaluate and contrast these two approaches, using simulated communities structured by different, known competition mechanisms, where species compete for different resources and experience varying levels of environmental heterogeneity. We find that the metrics provided by these approaches can jointly discriminate the mechanisms of competition driving productivity. We then apply our methods to data from a long-term biodiversity-ecosystem experiment (the Jena Experiment) and find that the data do not correspond to any of the competition scenarios we modeled. We address two additional possible complications: facilitation by nitrogen fixing plants, and non-equilibrium behavior during community assembly, and find that a combination of resource competition and facilitation by nitrogen fixing plants is the more likely explanation for the results obtained at Jena.