Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

2021644 citationsJournal Articlegold Open Access

Authors

Andrea Nevedal · VA Palo Alto Health Care System

Caitlin M. Reardon · VA Center for Clinical Management Research

Marilla A. Opra Widerquist · VA Center for Clinical Management Research

George L. Jackson · Duke University

Sarah L. Cutrona · University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

Brandolyn White · Durham VA Health Care System

Laura J. Damschroder

Abstract

Our rapid deductive CFIR approach was less time intensive and eliminated transcription costs, yet effective in meeting evaluation objectives and establishing rigor. Researchers should consider the following when employing our approach: (1) team expertise in the CFIR and qualitative methods, (2) level of detail needed to meet project aims, (3) mode of data to analyze, and (4) advantages and disadvantages of using the CFIR.

Topics & Keywords

Health Policy Implementation Science Evaluation and Performance Assessment Community Health and Development

Publication Details

Published in: Implementation Science

Volume 16, Issue 1, pp. 67-67

DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5

Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 113.34

Command Palette

Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

Authors

Abstract

Topics & Keywords

Publication Details