Search for a command to run...
Coastal ecosystems, including coral reefs, mangroves, and seagrass, are in global decline. Mitigation approaches include restoration and other managed recovery interventions. To maximise success, these should be guided by an understanding of the environmental niche and geographic limits of foundational species. However, the choices of data, variables, and modelling approaches can be bewildering when embarking on such an exercise, and the biases associated with such choices are often unknown. We reviewed the current available knowledge on methodological approaches and environmental variables used to model and map habitat suitability for coastal ecosystems. While our focus is on seagrass, we draw on information from all marine macrophyte studies for greater coverage of approaches at different scales around the world. We collated 75 publications, of which 35 included seagrasses. Out of all the publications, we found the most commonly used predictor variables were temperature (64%), bathymetry (61%), light availability (49%), and salinity (49%), respectively. The same predictor variables were also commonly used in the 35 seagrass Habitat Suitability Models (HSM) but in the following order: bathymetry (74%), salinity (57%), light availability (51%), and temperature (51%). The most popular method used in marine macrophyte HSMs was an ensemble of models (29%) followed by MaxEnt (17%). Cross-validation was the most commonly used selection procedure (24%), and threshold probability was the favoured model validation (33%). Most studies (87%) did not calculate or report uncertainty measures. The approach used to create an HSM was found to vary by location and scale of the study. Based upon previous studies, it can be suggested that the best approach for seagrass HSM would be to use an ensemble of models, including MaxEnt along with a selection procedure (Cross-validation) and threshold probability to validate the model with the use of uncertainty measures in the model process.