Tafasitamab and Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma (R/R LBCL): Real World Outcomes in a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background Outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have historically been poor, particularly for those who are ineligible for or progress after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The L-MIND study evaluated tafasitamab/lenalidomide (TL) in selected patients with R/R DLBCL who were ineligible for ASCT, with encouraging findings including overall response rate (ORR) of 60%, complete response rate (CRR) of 43%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.1 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 33.5 months (Salles et al., Lancet Onc 2020; Duell J. et al., Haematologica 2021). We performed a multicenter retrospective study to determine real-world characteristics of TL recipients, patterns of TL administration, and outcomes of treatment since US FDA approval. Methods We performed a retrospective study of all patients with R/R DLBCL treated with TL outside of a clinical trial at 9 institutions. Data on demographics, medical comorbidities, diagnosis, prior therapies and responses to prior therapies, adverse events (AEs) after TL, and ORR, CRR, PFS, and OS after initiation of TL were extracted from electronic medical records. Subgroup analyses evaluating outcomes in patients with prior chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) or other anti-CD19 therapy, primary refractory disease to initial therapy, relapsed vs refractory disease to last treatment, number of prior therapies, and IPI were also performed. ORR and CRR were compared using Fisher's exact test. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in curves were tested by the log-rank test. Results A total of 82 patients from 9 institutions were evaluated; all received at least 1 dose of tafasitamab and lenalidomide for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Overall, 75 (91%) of patients did not meet L-MIND study eligibility criteria; reasons for ineligibility included more than 3 prior lines of therapy (28%), prior anti-CD19 therapy (23%, including 21% with prior CAR T), HGBCL (13%), ECOG performance status 3-4 (18%), and renal dysfunction (EGFR < 60 ml/min) (33%). Dose delays in lenalidomide initiation occurred in 45% of patients; in patients with delays, median time between first tafasitamab and first lenalidomide was 7 days (range 1-78). Lenalidomide dose reductions at initiation occurred in 54% of patients, most commonly due to renal dysfunction (35%), performance status/frailty (18%), or cytopenias (9%). ORR for the entire cohort was 27% (95% CI 19-39), with CRR 17% (95% CI 10-27). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.8 - 3.6), and median OS 6.8 months (95% CI 4.9 - 9.3). Compared to refractory disease, relapsed disease to last therapy (defined as best response of PR or CR to last treatment, and relapse at least 6 months after treatment) was associated with better CRR (40% vs 7%, OR 8.5, p < 0.01), PFS (median 4.7 vs 1.9 mo, HR = 0.44; p < 0.01), and OS (median 9.6 vs 5.1 months, HR = 0.48; p = 0.03). Lower IPI score (0-3 vs 4-5) was associated with longer PFS (3.6 vs 1.7 mo, HR = 0.51 , p < 0.01) and OS (median 9.3 vs 3.4 mo, HR = 0.46, p < 0.01). Fewer prior lines of therapies (0-2 vs ≥3) was associated with longer PFS (3.6 vs 1.8 mo, HR 0.58; p = 0.03) but was not significantly associated with OS (9.3 vs 5.7 months, HR 0.74; p = 0.29). Prior CAR T or other CD19 therapy were not associated with worse CRR, PFS or OS. Median time from CAR T therapy to TL initiation was 14.3 months. Of 6 patients with refractory disease to CAR T, 1 of 6 achieved CR to TL (ORR 17%, CRR 17%), while 4 of 11 patients with relapsed disease after CAR T achieved CR (ORR 36%, CRR 36%). Conclusions In this real-world study of TL in R/R LBCL, clinical outcomes including ORR, CRR, PFS and OS were lower than observed in the L-MIND phase 2 clinical trial. These differences may be related to a greater incidence of high-risk disease features among real-world patients, higher rates of comorbidities, and frequent delays and dose reductions in lenalidomide treatment. Patients with relapsed disease to last therapy, low-moderate IPI (0-3), and fewer prior lines of therapy (0-2) had better outcomes than patients without these features, identifying a population that may derive the most benefit from TL treatment. Patients with relapsed disease after CD19-directed CAR T therapy also demonstrated potential for complete responses with TL, suggesting this regimen is a feasible approach in the post-CAR T setting. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal