Influence of different treatment conditions on the filtration performance of conventional electret melt blown non-woven and novel nano FFP2 masks

To allow an efficient protection against viruses like the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it is important to avoid their spreading by using filtering face pieces (FFP), which are categorized by different standards according to their filtration efficiency. In this study, we subjected six brands of FFP2 standard masks to three different conditions and subsequently analysed them for their filtration performance to evaluate potentials for reusability. The conditions comprised changes of temperature and air humidity, an exposure to isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and an autoclave sterilization. While four of six masks consisted of electrostatically treated melt blown non-wovens, two masks were fabricated using a nanofibrous multilayer system. Due to the absence of prior electrostatic treatment, the nano-masks did not show a significant change in filtration efficiency when discharged by IPA, unlike the melt blown nonwoven masks showing a significant decrease of filtration efficiency down to around 50% at a particle size of 0.3 μm. However, most melt blown masks maintained a sufficient filtration efficiency after all other treatments with even better results than the nanofibrous masks. This was particularly the case for the capacity to filter smallest particles/droplets with a size of around 0.1 μm, which is below the range of typical filtering standards and important for the retention of virally contaminated nano-aerosols or unattached viruses. After temperature/humidity variation and autoclave sterilization, melt blown masks were able to retain a filtration efficiency up to over 90% at 0.1 μm contrary to nano-masks showing a decrease down to around 70%. Based on their better filtration performance, lower price and potential reusability, we conclude that electret melt blown masks are the preferable type of FFP2 masks.