Gluteal Fat Grafting Technique and Mortality Update Among Surveyed ABCS Surgeons

Background: The demand for gluteal fat grafting (colloquially known as Brazilian butt lift [BBL]) has seen a dramatic increase in the past decade. Brazilian butt lift has been the fastest-growing cosmetic procedure in the United States for several years. During this time, the incidence of pulmonary fat embolisms (PFEs) associated with this procedure has raised safety concerns. Several professional organizations have responded to these concerns with investigational reports to identify the causes and provide recommendations to decrease the mortality associated with this popular cosmetic procedure. Awareness and implementation of these safety recommendations have been a cornerstone to decreasing the mortality rate associated with gluteal fat grafting. Objectives: To provide a comparison of current technical approaches and a mortality update on gluteal fat grafting among surgical members from the American Board of Cosmetic Surgeons (ABCS) within the last 6 years. Also, to determine if specific technical changes in the manner this procedure is performed are improving safety. Methods: An online (emailed) survey regarding perioperative gluteal fat grafting techniques and postoperative outcomes performed by ABCS surgeons within the previous 3 years was collected in 2 different 3-year time frames. Initial data were collected in 2019 for the preceding 3 years 2016-2019. The survey was again repeated in 2022 to collect similar data as before from ABCS member years 2019-2021. The data, which included the total # of BBLs performed, incidence of major infection or fat emboli, cannula size, and injection methods details was compared for each 3-year period. Both sequential studies provided a comparison of the techniques employed as well as morbidity and mortality outcomes. Results: Sixty-four ABCS surgeons who reported performing BBLs responded to the survey in 2019 and reported performing a total of 22 800 (BBLs) gluteal fat grafting cases in a previous 3-year window from 2016 to 2018. More surgeons used a closed system peristaltic pump in the second part of the study as compared to the first (51% vs 22%) ( P < .01). Two cases required in-hospital treatment of infection in the first survey while zero cases were reported for the second survey period ( P = .07). Twenty-five of 64 (39%) reported injecting fat at least into superficial gluteal muscle during this earlier time frame. In this earliest study, there were 3 total cases of PFE reported (2 fatal PFEs and 1 nonfatal PFEs). In 2022, 85 ABCS surgeons who reported performing BBLs responded to the survey. Around 12 172 gluteal fat grafting cases were reported in the second 3-year study from 2019 to 2021 compared to 22 800 in the first study ( P < .01). There was a total of 34 972 BBLs during the entire 6-year study. Most surgeons (82 of the 85) in the second-phase 3-year study reported injecting fat “exclusively” above the muscle ( P < .01). There were no fatal and non-fatal PFEs reported in the follow-up 3-year study in 2022 of ABCS member data from 2019 to 2021 ( P = .03). Conclusions: The mortality report associated with gluteal fat grafting from this survey among surgical members of the ABCS suggests using the current safety recommendations proposed, including injection of fat in the subcutaneous layer only, have led to a decreased risk of PFEs associated with gluteal fat grafting. The mortality rate was zero (0 out of 12 800) when 96% were injecting above muscle only compared to a mortality rate of 1:11 400 (2 of 22 800 cases) when 39% of 22 800 BBLs performed had fat injected into muscle. While there were more BBLs performed during the earlier 3-year study ( P = .07). The mortality rate significantly decreased in the years when only a small minority of cases had fat injected into the muscle. This study adds to other existing literature from professional organizations’ reports on the safety of gluteal fat grafting using the proper safety measure and recommendations.