Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: How, When and for Whom Is It an Alternative Option? A Narrative Review of the Literature

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Surgical repair of apical prolapse most commonly includes hysterectomy. However, nowadays, the number of women who seek uterine preserving surgical treatment is increasing. Our objective is to review the current evidence on laparoscopic hysteropexy techniques, outcomes and appropriate patient selection. <b>Methods</b>: A literature search was carried out in MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search was restricted to humans, female patients and currently used surgical procedures. <b>Results</b>: Laparoscopic hysteropexy was found to be associated with good anatomic outcomes, symptom improvement and low complication or reoperation rates. <b>Conclusions</b>: Laparoscopic hysteropexy appears to be a good alternative option for women who undergo surgical treatment for apical prolapse and desire preservation of the uterus. However, further prospective comparative studies, as well as longer follow-up periods, are necessary for evaluating long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of the method.