Search for a command to run...
The powerhouse of the United States military is undeniable, as is its impact on American citizens who inevitably feel its influence. This country’s voluntary conscription is called into question as its society has traditionally pushed for military service, even prepping the youth for war through sports and expectations of masculinity. In addition to this, many individuals enter the military enticed by its financial benefits and educational assistance. Is this conscription truly voluntary if there has remained a tradition and expectation of service? Even while in the military, informed consent is not likely to be given, as not all possible situations can be considered when deciding to serve. The military is a unique employer in this regard, as it has the potential and ability to leave its employees mentally unhealthy, disabled, or killed. This paternalistic institution has acted as a parent to a child, making decisions to ensure the best outcome for themselves, leaving the soldier’s autonomy behind. Utilizing narrative ethics, military ethics, and service-connected disability analysis, this piece examines the role that the military plays in the United States through its causing of disability. Throughout the history of this institution, soldiers have been given vaccines without the full information provided, subjected to experimental medicine, manipulated for experiments, and exposed to toxins that have deteriorated their minds and bodies. Soldiers deserve full bodily autonomy and informed consent when entering this line of work. Wartime is no excuse for this exploitative treatment of citizens. Loss of life is not worth the pursuit of total obedience and efficiency.
Published in: Northern Plains Ethics Journal
Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 125-134
DOI: 10.5840/npej20231118