Conventional vs. device-assisted paediatric circumcision: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Device-assisted paediatric circumcision appears to be associated with shorter operative times and reduced bleeding compared to conventional methods, with comparable rates of most complications. However, the evidence is limited by significant heterogeneity, variability in study quality, and a predominance of observational data. While the findings suggest potential advantages in high-volume or resource-limited settings, larger, well-conducted randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these results and guide clinical decision-making.