Search for a command to run...
As a frequent comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), iron deficiency worsens both symptom severity and overall prognosis.1 In patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (<50%), current guidelines recommend intravenous iron supplementation with ferric carboxymaltose or ferric derisomaltose to improve quality of life, alleviate HF symptoms, and prevent HF hospitalizations.2 This recommendation is based on positive trial results with these parenteral iron formulations,3 whereas oral iron products were shown to be ineffective and had more side effects. In the IRONOUT-HF trial, 16 weeks of high-dose oral iron polysaccharide did not improve exercise capacity in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.4 Moreover, oral supplementation only minimally increased iron indices, including ferritin and transferrin saturation. Novel oral iron preparations, such as ferric maltol or sucrosomial iron, may have enhanced bioavailability, but clinical trial data are scarce.5 Yet ferric maltol is approved for treating iron deficiency and has been shown to be safe, effective, and well tolerated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, chronic kidney disease, and pulmonary hypertension.6-8 We therefore conducted a multicentre, open-label, prospective clinical study, named the ORION-HF study, to investigate the impact of orally formulated ferric maltol in patients with symptomatic HF and iron deficiency anaemia (EudraCT Number: 2021-000130-33). This study evaluated the efficacy of ferric maltol in improving haemoglobin concentration, iron indices, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HF and iron deficiency anaemia, in seven German study sites. ORION-HF enrolled patients with HF and iron deficiency anaemia, which was defined as either serum ferritin concentration <100 μg/L or 100–299 μg/L with transferrin saturation concentration <20%. Patients were also required to have mild-to-moderate anaemia, defined as haemoglobin concentrations ≥8 and <12 g/dl in women and ≥9 and <13 g/dl in men. Eligibility criteria included New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV HF irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction. The main exclusion criteria were other active haematological disorders, malignancy, active bleeding, ongoing oral or intravenous iron supplementation, concomitant erythropoietin treatment, or severe kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate <20 ml/min). Moreover, patients with either an acute coronary syndrome or a transient ischaemic attack or stroke within the last 30 days were excluded, as were those scheduled to undergo major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery, device implantation, or percutaneous coronary intervention within the subsequent 16 weeks. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Nr. 10551_AMG_M_2022), and all patients provided written informed consent. The study was supported by a research grant from Norgine to Hannover Medical School. Ferric maltol was administered orally at the approved dose of 30 mg twice daily. The primary study objective was the change in haemoglobin levels from baseline to 16 weeks of treatment. Secondary objectives included the effects of oral ferric maltol on iron status (ferritin, transferrin saturation), exercise capacity (6-min walk test), quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ]), and safety outcomes. The study enrolled 50 patients, of whom 41 received at least one dose of the study drug and completed the assessment at 16 weeks (primary analysis as defined per our protocol). The reasons for the nine premature discontinuations were consent withdrawal (n = 4) or drop out after an adverse event (n = 5). Continuous variables were compared using a paired t-test to assess within-group differences. To account for multiple comparisons, a Bonferroni correction was applied to 28 tests, setting statistical significance at p < 0.00179. The median age of the patients was 80 (25th–75th percentile, 68–84) years; 32% were women. All patients exhibited symptomatic HF (NYHA class II/III/IV, n = 24/4/13) due to HF with either reduced ejection fraction (<50%, n = 16) or preserved ejection fraction (≥50%, n = 25). Patients had a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 53% (38–62%) and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 51 (35–63) ml/min/1.73 m2. The main results are shown in Table 1. In the primary analysis, oral ferric maltol treatment resulted in significantly increased haemoglobin (from 11.4 [10.9–11.9] to 12.8 [11.8–13.8] g/dl), transferrin saturation (from 14% [8–19] to 29% [22–37]), and ferritin (from 43 [25–82] to 107 [65–140] μg/L); p < 0.001 for all comparisons. At baseline, 33 patients (80%) had a transferrin saturation of <20%; among these patients, haemoglobin concentration rose from 11.4 (10.9–11.8) to 13.0 (12.2–14) g/dl at week 16 (p < 0.001). In addition, distance walked in the 6-min walk test improved (from 298 [220–405] to 335 [255–430] m, p < 0.001), as did KCCQ overall summary score (from 65 [44–82] to 76 [55–86] score points, p = 0.004). Notably, results from the per-protocol analysis of all patients who completed the 16-week treatment period (n = 35) were entirely consistent (data not shown). As illustrated in Figure 1, pronounced gains in haemoglobin, transferrin saturation, and ferritin occurred within the first 8 weeks of treatment. Online supplementary Figure S1 depicts changes in haemoglobin, iron, transferrin saturation and ferritin from baseline to week 8 or week 16, respectively. Online supplementary Figure S2 illustrates how the severity of iron deficiency relates to the severity of anaemia and the haemoglobin response to iron. The ferric maltol treatment was generally well tolerated. Adverse events potentially related to the medication were common (n = 19) and predominantly gastrointestinal in nature (e.g. diarrhoea, constipation, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting). Serious adverse events (one case each of pleural empyema, coronary artery disease, retinal vein occlusion, and syncope) were all considered unrelated to the study medication. Two deaths occurred during the main study period, both unrelated to the study medication. By design, our study has several limitations, including a small sample size, an open-label design, and a lack of a control group. Additionally, we applied the current European Society of Cardiology HF guideline-based definition of iron deficiency, despite growing recognition of its limitations. Although dynamic variations in haemoglobin and iron indices have been reported in patients with HF and iron deficiency anaemia,9 the consistent and directional changes observed in ORION-HF indicate that ferric maltol exerts a true pharmacological effect. This result contrasts with those from previous trials with other oral iron formulations, such as oral iron polysaccharide, that did not achieve similar improvements in iron availability.4 These results may inform future trials comparing ferric maltol to intravenous iron supplementation in HF. In conclusion, this observational study in patients with HF found that 16 weeks of ferric maltol was associated with increases in haemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation, changes that indicate resolution of iron deficiency. Gastrointestinal side effects were common but tolerated by most patients. Whether the observed improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity should be attributed to ferric maltol awaits confirmation in randomized trials comparing it to both placebo and intravenous iron in patients with robustly defined iron deficiency. If ferric maltol and intravenous iron prove to be similarly effective and there is no urgent need to correct iron deficiency, then oral iron supplements would be a logistically less challenging approach to iron supplementation. However, larger, placebo-controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these results and determine the long-term efficacy and safety of ferric maltol in HF. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Clinical Research Unit [KFO] 311 to J.B., M.M.H., and T.K.). This investigator-sponsored trial was financially supported by Norgine BV, Amsterdam. The funder had no role in protocol design, study procedures, data acquisition, analysis, or decision to submit for publication. Conflict of interest: T.K. has received honoraria for consultations or lectures from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Vifor, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Medtronic, Edwards, Norgine, Pharmacosmos, Vifor Pharma, and Sciarc, and has received research support from Vifor Pharma. J.F. has received honoraria for consultations from AstraZeneca. M.M.H. has received honoraria for consultations or lectures from 35Pharma, Acceleron, Actelion, Aerovate, AOP Health, Bayer, Ferrer, Gossamer, Inhibikase, Janssen, Keros, MSD, and Novartis. S.S. has received honoraria for consultations or lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, and Novo Nordisk, all outside the submitted work. T.B. has received honoraria for consultations or lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Sanofi, and Zoll. C.S. has received financial research support, for conducting an investigator-initiated trial, from Vifor Pharma Intl. AG. U.B. has received travel support and honoraria for lectures/consulting from Alnylam Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Astr Zeneca, Bayer Vital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer, and institutional research support from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to this article. J.B. has received honoraria for consultations or lectures from Novartis, Abbott, Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Cardior, CVRx, BMS, Amgen, Edwards, Roche, and Zoll, and research support for the department from Zoll, CVRx, Abiomed, Norgine, and Roche. All other authors have nothing to disclose. Appendix S1. Supporting Information. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Published in: European Journal of Heart Failure
Volume 27, Issue 11, pp. 2325-2327
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3789