Search for a command to run...
Organizations routinely struggle to convert strategy into coordinated, sustainable execution. This paper posits that the persistent strategy-execution gap is a structural leadership problem: organizations rarely define and govern the leadership function that connects strategic intent with day-to-day work. It introduces a Layered Leadership system comprising three interdependent tiers: strategic, operational, and self-leadership and focuses on the middle tier, Operational Leadership (OL), because it is under-specified relative to strategic and self-leadership concepts. OL is defined as the translational function at the Strategy-Execution Interface (SEI) that governs cross-functional integration, coordination, and momentum. The SEI is referred to as the organizational space where strategic intent is translated into coordinated work across functions. Conceptually, the paper synthesizes middle-management, strategy-as-practice, dynamic-capabilities, and coordination literature to position the Layered Leadership system and distinguish OL from adjacent constructs such as PMO, product operations, and line management. Empirically, it reports on three six-week prototype programs in small and medium-sized enterprises (n=56) that activated OL practices within intact leadership systems. Methodologically, it specifies a reproducible SEI indicator, the Capacity Ratio (CR), that quantifies how well the leadership system converts available capacity into sustainable execution using defined inputs, computation steps, and interpretation bands. Descriptive pre/post signals suggest gains in throughput, retention, engagement, and executive time freed for strategic work. Further, the paper outlines boundary conditions, ethical considerations, and a research agenda for validating OL and system-level SEI measures.
Published in: Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Management and Economics
Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 1-13