Leadless Versus Transvenous Dual‐Chamber Pacemakers: Real‐World Evidence From AVEIR DR Coverage With Evidence Development Study

20260 citationsJournal Articlehybrid Open Access

Authors

Monica Lo · Arkansas Heart Hospital

Anish K. Amin · OhioHealth

Marcin Kowalski · Hofstra University

Anne M. Kroman · Medical University of South Carolina

Dilip Mathew · Sarasota Memorial Hospital

Valay Parikh · Hofstra University

Stanislav Weiner ·

Abstract

Despite a higher comorbidity burden, AVEIR DR LP had significantly fewer device-related complications, overall 6-month complications, and device reinterventions compared to TP, with similar overall 30-day complications, mortality, and heart failure hospitalizations.

Topics & Keywords

Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Publication Details

Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Volume 37, Issue 3, pp. 544-553

DOI: 10.1111/jce.70255

Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Command Palette

Leadless Versus Transvenous Dual‐Chamber Pacemakers: Real‐World Evidence From AVEIR DR Coverage With Evidence Development Study

Authors

Abstract

Topics & Keywords

Publication Details