Complexities in reflective practice facilitation in a forensic mental health setting

Purpose Research supporting the utility and effectiveness of reflective practice in forensic settings is steadily growing, with recognition that the benefits of structured reflection for staff who work in these environments are significant. However, much of the research examining how to maximise the effectiveness of the reflective process does so from the perspective of session participants. When the perspective of the facilitator is considered, it is generally done so with respect to how to improve the process for group members, as opposed to recognising and addressing the challenges that are faced by facilitators. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to describe some of the intrapsychic and ethical challenges experienced by facilitators of a Reflective Practice Framework in a forensic mental health setting. Findings Four main challenges are discussed: the pull to problem solve, the importance of bringing “ourselves” into the room, responding to psychological hazards commonly experienced in forensic mental health settings and balancing duty of care and confidentiality. Practical implications The relevant research literature is reflected upon, followed by a description of how facilitators navigated these challenges. Originality/value This paper provides practical support to facilitators of reflective practice in navigating the complexities of delivering this service to staff in a forensic mental health setting and highlights key implications for practice.