Search for a command to run...
The paper discusses some controversial religious ideas brought forth by Freud, Jung, and Frankl respectively in their works. By presenting their writings in their entirety, this study elucidates the historical conditions under which their views and arguments acquired interpretive weight, particularly during a period in which they perceived contemporary society as bereft of relevance or significance. Freud claimed that religion was a doll dream which was satisfied by desire of the unconscious and psychological economy. However, Jung viewed religion as a symbolic embodiment of the collective unconscious and argued religious traditions give archetypical patterns to facilitate psychological absorption and individuation. Frankl’s humanistic perspective on the context of religion and the meaning-seeking process of humanity surpassed Freud and Jung in asserting that existential orientation and a sense of transcendence are critical to the psychological well-being and human prosperity. The paper uses a comparative hermeneutic approach to analyze the three authors’ views in relation to mental health crises, educational change, intercultural dialogue, and the search for existential meaning in an increasingly rapid world. The study’s interdisciplinary reach, spanning psychology, religion, philosophy, and education, makes it relevant to both theoretical inquiry and practical implementation. The authors of this writing observe the restraints imposed by methodological, cultural, and historical factors on Western existential and psychoanalytic philosophy, with due respect that there is not always the space in this thought for the richness of religious experience. The enduring interpretations of Freud, Jung, and Frankl reveal religion as an existential, psychological, and cultural phenomenon in postmodern society.