Global regulatory collaboration for the assessment of lenacapavir as a long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection

Availability of long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection will be essential for disease control. Despite substantial progress in prevention strategies, the number of people with HIV grew by 1.3 million in 2024 globally, with almost half of new carriers living in Africa. 1 Although PrEP has been recommended since 2015 by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for people at an increased risk of infection, 2 uptake has been limited and adherence is frequently inadequate. Daily oral PrEP is safe and efficacious in preventing HIV, particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM), serodiscordant couples, and people who inject drugs (PWIDs). 3 In addition, event-driven (on-demand) oral PrEP has been demonstrated to be as effective as daily dosing among MSM in Europe. 4 Notably, the efficacy was strongly associated with the levels of adherence. It is estimated that less than 30% of people who start using daily oral PrEP receive the HIV protective benefit of PrEP within six months of initiation due to discontinuation or poor adherence. 5 Oral PrEP discontinuation rates are highest in Sub-Saharan Africa, the region with the greatest HIV-1 burden. 5 The first evidence of the benefits of long-acting PrEP came from the development program of cabotegravir. People taking an injection once every two months showed better adherence and a reduced risk of HIV infection compared with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). 6 It is therefore expected that long-acting PrEPs with even lower dosing frequencies will further improve adherence and, hence, HIV prevention strategies.Lenacapavir is a long-acting inhibitor of HIV-1 capsid function that is injected subcutaneously every six months. In 2022, it was authorised in the EU for the treatment of multidrug resistant HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral therapies. 7 On 24 July 2025, the Committee for Medicinal Product for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) finalised its evaluation of lenacapavir for PrEP and considered the benefit-risk balance to be positive, recommending the marketing authorisation of lenacapavir for PrEP, in combination with safer sex practices, to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection in adults and adolescents with increased HIV-1 acquisition risk. 8,9 Lenacapavir PrEP is the first medicine that was evaluated by EMA under accelerated assessment for a parallel EU-wide authorisation (marketed as Yeytuo 8 ) and the use outside EU 9 via EU medicines for all (EU-M4all) procedure. EU-M4all aims to facilitate patient access to essential medicines that prevent or treat diseases of major public health interest in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) based on an EU scientific opinion. 10 During the assessment of lenacapavir PrEP, experts from WHO and national regulatory authorities (NRAs) from Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, Vietnam, Zambia, and Zimbabwe contributed to the scientific discussions by adding geographical considerations and perspectives on healthcare and pharmacovigilance systems of their countries. This inclusive approach supports regulatory harmonisation and strengthens global capacity to protect public health. The accelerated assessment for lenacapavir shortened the timeline for review to 120 days instead of the standard 210 days since EMA considered that this product was of major public health interest.Evidence of efficacy submitted in the application was demonstrated by the results of two phase three studies in people at an increased risk of infection: PURPOSE 1, involving 8094 adolescent and adult cisgender women, and PURPOSE 2, involving 4634 adolescent and adult men, and gender-diverse persons. 11,12 The primary analyses showed that HIV-1 incidence in lenacapavir group was lower compared with an estimate of background HIV-1 incidence. However, CHMP considered the comparison unreliable, as it assumes that participants who were HIV-1 negative at screening and, therefore, were eligible for the randomised phase of the studies would subsequently contract HIV-1 at the same rate as the entire screened population, including those who were HIV-1 positive at screening and consequently were not eligible for the randomised phase. Secondary analyses, however, showed a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the incidence of HIV-1 infections with lenacapavir compared with daily oral TDF/FTC (PURPOSE 1: rate ratio (RR): 0.000, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000, 0.101; p <0.0001; PURPOSE 2: RR: 0.111; 95% CI: 0.024, 0.513; p = 0.00245). 8,9 Importantly, treatment adherence was higher in participants who received lenacapavir compared with those given daily oral TDF/FTC. At week 52, 93.5% (PURPOSE 1) and 92.7% (PURPOSE 2) participants in the lenacapavir group received their injections on time while 62% or less participants of TDF/FTC group showed high levels of tenofovir diphosphate in dried-blood-spot samples. 11,12 Safety data for up to 12 months of exposure from 4323 participants were considered adequate for assessment. Overall, lenacapavir was well-tolerated at the authorised dose and method of administration. The most common adverse reactions were mild to moderate injection site reactions (68.8-83.2%), which included slow or non-resolving injection site nodules (35.5-35.9%). 8,9 EMA will review new safety data on a regular basis. [7][8][9] The available data on the use of lenacapavir PrEP in pregnant and breastfeeding people show that the medicine may be considered in these groups if the expected benefit outweighs the potential risk to the foetus or child. 8,9 A registry study on anti-retroviral use during pregnancy is ongoing to generate additional data on use in pregnancy and breastfeeding.For transgender individuals, co-administration of lenacapavir with gender-affirming hormones estradiol and testosterone did not lead to clinically relevant interactions. Plasma concentration of progesterone may be increased when co-administered with lenacapavir. Interaction with antiandrogens was not studied. Therefore, no dose adjustment of these gender-affirming hormones is recommended when co-administered with lenacapavir. 8,9 Lastly, there is a risk of developing resistance to lenacapavir if HIV-1 infection occurs before initiation, during treatment, or after discontinuation of the medicine. To mitigate this risk, HIV-1negative status must be confirmed prior to starting lenacapavir, before each subsequent injection, and monitored as clinically indicated. A combined antigen/antibody test and an HIV-RNA test should yield negative results. If combined testing is not available, testing should follow local guidelines. Individuals who are confirmed to have HIV-1 should immediately begin a complete antiretroviral (ARV) regimen to reduce the likelihood of resistance development. Lenacapavir-resistant HIV-1 variants retain susceptibility to all first-line ARV classes owing to lenacapavir's novel mechanism of action. Therefore, the risk is considered to have minimal clinical impact.there is a risk of developing resistance to lenacapavir if an individual acquires HIV-1 either before or while taking the medicine. This risk will be further characterised in a non-interventional study. 8,9 3 DiscussionLenacapavir provides a valuable additional long-acting option in the HIV PrEP armamentarium and brings clinical benefits in diverse at-risk populations based on high efficacy and a long administration interval which prompt improved adherence compared to oral PrEP. The WHO has recommended lenacapavir as an additional HIV prevention modality to be integrated into combination HIV prevention approaches. 13 Provided wide access, long-acting PrEPs are expected to have a global impact by improving HIV PrEP uptake and adherence. The scientific opinion from the CHMP will facilitate WHO prequalification and registration of lenacapavir in LMICs. Following WHO prequalification, the NRAs in LMICs can make their own regulatory decisions, ensuring regulatory autonomy and local contexts. Accordingly, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), the Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA), and Zimbabwe's Medicines Control Authority (MCAZ) have recently registered lenacapavir for PrEP in record time by adopting the CHMP scientific opinion as the result of the EU-M4All procedure. Other NRAs which were involved in the EU-M4All procedure are expected to follow suit. This procedure exemplifies the need for regulatory collaboration to facilitate timely access of medical products addressing global health needs.The registration of long-acting PrEPs is a prerequisite for the marketing authorisation application of their generic products. This procedure exemplifies the need for regulatory collaboration to facilitate timely access of medical products addressing global health needs. Moreover, pricing agreement, early implementation studies and expansion of access to lenacapavir in LMICs have been announced. [14][15][16] These global initiatives and collaborations will foster early and equitable access to long-acting HIV PrEPs particularly in countries with high burden of HIV-1.The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the authors and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of or reflecting the position of the regulatory agency/agencies or organisations with which the authors are employed/affiliated.