The "Dewey Lippman Debate" and The Role of Democratic Communication on The Trump Age

This paper examines the "Dewey-Lippmann debate" and its enduring significance for contemporary democracy, which currently suffers from deep political polarization within a fractured media landscape.The examination begins with communication theorist James Carey's original characterization of Lippmann as a positivist seeking a world of objective, accurate information in contrast to Dewey, who identifies the contingent, constructed nature of knowledge achieved through processes of communication.This analysis re-examines Lippmann's and Dewey's positions in light of subsequent arguments that challenge Carey's conclusions.It will be argued that, while Carey's critics are correct that Lippmann held a more nuanced position on democracy than Carey acknowledges, they also largely misunderstand his Dewey-inspired arguments about the meaning making functions of communication.By highlighting the role of the habits of communication in Dewey's democratic analysis, this paper points toward suggestions for bolstering participatory democracy while simultaneously fostering a less polarized culture.