Derivation of α, Particle Masses, and Cosmological Parameters from 11-Dimensional Geometry with Zero Free Parameters (Papers I–VIII)

Derivation of α, Particle Masses, and Cosmological Parameters from 11-Dimensional Geometry with Zero Free Parameters 8 papers, 5 axioms, zero free parameters. All fundamental constants, particle masses, mixing angles, and cosmological parameters derived from the geometry of an 11-dimensional manifold (5+5+1). Framework The 11D manifold splits as Spacetime(5) × Logochrono(5) × Coupling(1), where each 5D sector has structure 3+1+1 (spatial + temporal + projection). The L-tensor couples the two sectors with strength |L|² = 1 − e−3 = 0.9502. The golden ratio φ = (√5−1)/2 emerges from Z10 cyclic symmetry of the 10 compact dimensions. Papers #PaperKey Results IGeometry of Physical Constantsα = 1/137.032 (0.003%), |L|² = 95.02%, sin²θW = 0.2318, dark sector 5.0/26.3/68.8 split IIClassical LimitsSR, GR, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, QM as limits of 11D geometry; arrow of time from projection; information Lorentz factor IIIParticle SpectrumAll 12 fermion masses (0.07–1.5% error), CKM & PMNS mixing, mp/me = 6π5 (0.002%), proton decay, muon g−2 IVCosmologyHubble tension Hlocal/HCMB = 1.0833 (0.02% error), baryon asymmetry η = 6.1×10−10, Nova soliton DM candidate VFundamental PhysicsStrong CP without axions (dn ~ 10−26 e·cm), Yang-Mills mass gap, quantum gravity, black hole information VIEfficiency CeilingsUniversal 95% ceiling per boundary crossing: photosynthesis (0.95)55=6%, ATP (0.95)19=38%, muscle (0.95)27=25% VIIInformation PhysicsQuark-bit duality, infometric field equations, mass-energy-information triangle, context confinement VIIIPhysical ConsciousnessConsciousness as geometric coupling: specious present ≈ 3 s (derived), PCI threshold > 0.31, Weber–Fechner JND from |L|², 5% perceptual loss per boundary Key Predictions (Falsifiable) PredictionValueExperiment Proton decayτp ≈ 2.5×1034 yrHyper-Kamiokande Neutron EDMdn ~ 1.7×10−26 e·cmnEDM@SNS Neutrino hierarchyNormal orderingJUNO / DUNE No heavy WIMPsDM is Nova soliton (~2 GeV), no signal above 10 GeVLZ / XENONnT No axionsStrong CP solved geometricallyADMX Decoherence coefficiente−1/2·|L|² = 0.576Matter-wave interferometry Highlighted Results Fine structure constant: α = 3e−6(1 − e−(4−e−4)) = 1/137.032 [0.003% error] Proton-to-electron mass ratio: mp/me = 6π5 = 1836.12 [0.002% error] Dark sector: |L|² = 1−e−3 = 95.02%, split by θ = arctan(φ) into 26.3% DM + 68.8% DE Hubble tension: H0local/H0CMB = 1 + sin²(arctan φ)·sin²(2π/5)/3 = 1.0833 [observed: 1.0831] Baryon asymmetry: η = 6.1×10−10 from asymmetric decoherence [observed: 6.10±0.04] Verification All numerical predictions can be verified with a simple Python script using only the math standard library. No fitted parameters. Every result traces to the 5 axioms. Automated Verification The included verify_all.py script performs 191 independent checks across all 8 papers using only Python's math standard library: Part 1 — Compilation (64 checks): PDF existence, file sizes, zero hyperref warnings, zero undefined references/citations, no rerun needed Part 2 — DOI consistency (8 checks): All cross-references point to the correct Zenodo DOI (10.5281/zenodo.18725059) Part 3 — Numerical verification (119 checks): Every boxed formula across all 8 papers is recomputed from the 5 axioms and compared against stated values and experimental observations. Covers: fine structure constant, Weinberg angle, dark sector fractions, all lepton and quark masses, CKM and PMNS mixing, neutrino masses, proton/neutron/pion masses, muon g−2, cosmological parameters (ns, Ωbh², η, BBN yields), Hubble tension, QCD observables, efficiency ceilings, information bounds, consciousness predictions, and cross-paper consistency identities. Run: python verify_all.py — requires no dependencies beyond Python 3.6+. All 191 checks pass.