Adhering to dietary guidelines does not yield flavanol intake levels associated with beneficial cardiovascular effects

Abstract Outcomes from the COSMOS trial have reinforced the notion of flavanols as important plant-derived bioactives contributing to cardiovascular health. As discussions continue on whether specific dietary reference values for flavanols are warranted, it is possible that existing dietary guidelines emphasizing fruits and vegetables already yield sufficient flavanol intake levels. If this were the case, developing flavanol specific dietary reference values might be unnecessary. This study therefore aimed at assessing whether adherence to dietary recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake and overall diet quality achieves flavanol intake levels of 500 mg/day, the amount proven to mediate cardiovascular benefits in the COSMOS trial. Flavanol intake was objectively evaluated using two validated and complementary biomarkers, 5-(3□,4□-dihydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone metabolites (gVLM B ) and structurally related (–)-epicatechin metabolites (SREM B ), in two geographically distinct studies: COSMOS (US; n=6,509) and EPIC-Norfolk (UK; n=24,154). The results showed that higher fruit and vegetable intakes and diet quality (assessed via the alternative healthy eating index–aHEI) were associated with increased flavanol intake in COSMOS. Nevertheless, fewer than 25% of participants meeting dietary guidelines achieved an estimated flavanol intake of ≥500 mg/day. Similar findings were observed in EPIC-Norfolk as well as through flavanol intake simulations considering fruits and vegetables commonly consumed in the US diet. In conclusion, adherence to existing dietary guidelines does not yield flavanol intake levels comparable to those shown to provide cardiovascular benefits in COSMOS. Thus, specific dietary reference values for flavanols may still be necessary if aiming to increase the intake of these dietary compounds. Graphical abstract