Search for a command to run...
Abstract 3D-DXA reconstructs DXA hip scans to 3-dimensional images allowing measurement of trabecular and cortical bone parameters. Given the higher image quality of GE Healthcare iDXA than GE Healthcare Prodigy, it could be hypothesized that the reconstruction might differ, thereby affecting 3D-DXA results. The aim of the study was to assess agreement and precision of 3D-DXA cortical and trabecular femur parameters between Prodigy and iDXA densitometers in adult subjects. The study cohort was composed of 391 men and women recruited from 3 clinical centers (USA and Brazil). All subjects were scanned on either Prodigy or iDXA scanners. Short-term precision was assessed on two Prodigy and two iDXA densitometers. 3D-DXA analyses were performed using 3D-Shaper software version 2.14. Agreement between densitometers was assessed by regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Short-term precision was determined following International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommendations. Strong agreements for 3D-DXA parameters were obtained between devices regardless of the center or the DXA device model (all R 2 > 0.96). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated statistically (p < 0.05), but not clinically, significant difference between both aBMD and 3D-DXA measurements obtained using Prodigy and iDXA scanners. Short-term precision of areal BMD and 3D-DXA parameters was similar between densitometers. This study demonstrated excellent 3D-DXA measurement agreement and similar precision between iDXA and Prodigy densitometers. These data provide evidence that no adjustments are required when using 3D-Shaper software on iDXA or Prodigy instruments. Mini Abstract We assessed agreement and precision of 3D-DXA parameters between GE Healthcare Prodigy and iDXA densitometers in adults. Strong agreement was observed between devices, and short-term precision was comparable. Findings indicate that no adjustment is needed when using 3D-DXA with GE Healthcare densitometers.