Maintenance Strategies in High-Risk Myeloma: A Multicenter Comparison of Bortezomib–Lenalidomide Versus Lenalidomide Alone: A USMIRC Multicenter Analysis

<b>Background:</b> Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma; however, these benefits are attenuated in high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM). No standard post-transplant maintenance strategy is established for HRMM, and some centers employ doublet maintenance with bortezomib plus lenalidomide (VR). We evaluated outcomes with VR versus lenalidomide alone (R) in HRMM. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a multicenter retrospective study through the US Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), including adults with HRMM who received R or VR maintenance following ASCT between January 2009 and January 2024. HRMM was defined by del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20), with or without 1q gain. PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Median follow-up was 91 months. Baseline characteristics, induction regimens, and post-transplant response depth were well balanced between the groups. Median PFS was 51 months (95% CI, 20-NR) with VR and 36 months (95% CI, 31-56) with R (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Median OS was 103 months (95% CI, 90-NR) and 110 months (95% CI, 94-NR), respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). VR was associated with numerically longer PFS, although the difference was not statistically significant. No treatment-related mortality occurred within 100 days post-ASCT. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this multicenter real-world analysis of HRMM, VR maintenance did not result in statistically significant improvements in PFS or OS compared with lenalidomide alone. These findings underscore the need for prospective, risk-adapted trials incorporating novel maintenance strategies, including CD38- and BCMA-directed therapies, in high-risk disease.