Search for a command to run...
Secondary succession in tropical forests is traditionally described as a linear process driven by time since disturbance. However, growing evidence suggests that recovery pathways depend strongly on historical and environmental contexts. We evaluated how disturbance legacies and edaphic constraints interact to shape successional trajectories in a tropical karst landscape of the Maya Forest, Mexico. We sampled 100 plots along a chronosequence, quantifying vegetation structure, floristic diversity, biomass (NDVI), disturbance legacies, and soil properties. Using unsupervised clustering (K-means) and multivariate ordination, we identified four contrasting ecological typologies that represent distinct successional states rather than transient stages. Our results show a pronounced dichotomy in vegetation dynamics following the abandonment of land-use practices: while some sites are experiencing diverse development due to positive forest legacies (Typology B), others remain stalled (Typology C), dominated by lianas, where biotic barriers inhibit tree regeneration despite decades of abandonment. Additionally, we documented an asynchronous recovery between floristic recovery and vertical development; in sites with edaphic constraints, forests reach high diversity and biomass but exhibit stunted growth (Typology D). This suggests that severe abiotic constraints—specifically high rockiness and shallow soils—limit the dominance of highly competitive species, thereby acting as a filter that maintains high levels of diversity despite structural limitations. Edaphic analysis confirmed that chemical fertility and physical constraints (rockiness and shallow depth) act as orthogonal filters. This explains the persistence of structurally constrained yet functionally mature forests as stable, edaphically determined outcomes. Overall, secondary succession in tropical karst is nonlinear and path-dependent, governed by a hierarchical filtering model where historical land use dictates community identity and physical substrate limits structural architecture. These findings highlight the need for trajectory-specific management and the abandonment of uniform expectations of forest recovery in karst landscapes.