A GIS–AHP-Based Spatial Decision Support System for Optimising Harvesting and Wood System Selection in the Chestnut Coppice Stands of Central Italy

Sustainable forest operations require operational planning tools that effectively integrate productivity, environmental conservation, and social acceptability, particularly within complex and environmentally sensitive forest systems. In Mediterranean small-scale forestry, harvesting decisions are frequently guided by expert judgment rather than by systematic and transparent planning frameworks. This reliance on subjective decision making can result in heterogeneous management practices and, in some cases, suboptimal operational outcomes. This study aims to validate a GIS-based Analytic Hierarchy Process (GIS–AHP) decision support system for the selection of harvesting and wood systems in the chestnut coppices of central Italy and to assess the robustness of its recommendations when expert judgments are provided by different stakeholder groups. The methodology integrates spatial data and multi-criteria analysis to evaluate the suitability of three extraction systems (forwarder, cable skidder, and cable yarder) and three wood systems (Cut-To-Length, Whole-Tree Harvesting, and Tree-Length) across 162 Forest Management Units (1332.5 ha), using weights elicited from four stakeholder categories (researchers, technicians, forest owners, and workers; n = 144). Results show statistically significant differences in mean suitability values among stakeholder groups for all systems; however, convergence at the operational decision level is high. The cable skidder is recommended over 94%–100% of the area depending on the stakeholder category, with full agreement among all groups in 87.7% of the Forest Management Units. For wood systems, Whole-Tree Harvesting is selected over 96.1% of the analysed area, with agreement in 95.1% of the Forest Management Units. Divergences are therefore limited and attributable to differences in AHP weighting structures. Overall, the findings demonstrate that the GIS–AHP approach provides stable and transferable recommendations despite variability in expert perspectives, supporting its applicability as a transparent and robust decision support tool for operational planning in chestnut coppices and similar Mediterranean forest systems.