Search for a command to run...
Background: Given global population growth and aging, it is imperative to prioritize early eye disease detection and treatment. However, as patient volume increases, providers are facing a shortage of workforce capacity, particularly in areas where eye doctors are already scarce, making it important to consider alternative innovative solutions that could help increase eye screening capabilities. This study compared virtual reality (VR) platform of vision screening exams that are used to evaluate ocular health, such as 24-2 perimetry, Ishihara tiles, and the Amsler grid, against their in-clinic counterparts. Methods: A total of 86 subjects were recruited from Mount Sinai’s ophthalmology clinic (New York, USA) for a comparison trial that was internally controlled across healthy eyes and those with glaucoma and retinal diseases. VR and in-office tests were administered to the patients during their clinical visit, including 24-2 perimetry, Ishihara tiles, and the Amsler grid in a randomized order, and the results were compared for each test. Results: Perimetry results from Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HVFA) and VR suprathreshold testing demonstrated a good sensitivity both overall (80% OD, 84% OS) and across control (86% OD, 89% OS), glaucoma (69% OD, 78% OS), and retinal disease (76% OD, 80% OS) groups. A Garway-Heath anatomical map showed an overall 70–80% agreement. Ishihara plate tests did not show a significant difference between the two testing modalities (p = 0.12; Mann–Whitney U test), which remained true across all groups. Amsler grid testing differences were also non-significant within each subgroup (p = 0.81; Mann–Whitney U test). Patient time required to complete VR exams was significantly improved (p < 0.0001; Welch’s t-test) compared to the clinical standard tests. Conclusions: All VR-based exams tested in this study showed high sensitivity and percent agreement when compared to their in-office standards. Given the results of this study, VR has a promising potential in visual function screening, which, in addition to its portable design and easy use, could assist eye doctors in screening for prevalent diseases such as glaucoma and retinal conditions. Translational Relevance: VR-based vision exams that test vision fields, color vision and visual distortions provide comparable results in healthy patients, as well as those with glaucoma and retinal diseases, indicating its potential as a screening technology for different ocular pathologies. Given VR’s portable and low-profile features, it is important to consider leveraging VR to augment delivery of vision care.
Published in: Journal of Clinical & Translational Ophthalmology
Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 8-8
DOI: 10.3390/jcto4010008