Reach, implementation fidelity, and safety of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) therapy in children with severe pneumonia in Pakistan

Abstract Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is a low-cost respiratory support device that has demonstrated different outcomes for children with severe pneumonia in different settings. Some differences in outcomes may be attributable to implementation factors (e.g., patient monitoring and feeding practices). We aimed to characterize bCPAP reach, implementation fidelity, and safety outcomes for children with severe pneumonia in Pakistan. We conducted a prospective cohort study at Aga Khan University Hospital and Abbasi Shaheed Hospital from February through May 2025. We enrolled children 1–59 months who met WHO criteria for severe pneumonia within 24 hours of presentation to the emergency department. Participants were followed daily via chart review, caregiver survey, and physical exam through discharge, transfer, or death. We reported the proportion of children receiving bCPAP (“reach”) and constructed a mixed-effects, multinomial logistic regression model with robust standard errors to report: fidelity (child location in a highly monitored area, continuous monitoring, avoidance of unplanned disruptions to bCPAP, and avoidance of oral feeding); safety (aspiration events and pneumothorax); bCPAP failure (death, respiratory support escalation, or leaving against medical advice); and in-hospital mortality. Of 165 children with severe pneumonia, 88 (53%) received bCPAP over 141 bCPAP days. The average predicted probabilities (95% CI) of our fidelity measures were: 85% (78-92%) for location in a highly monitored area; 56% (51-60%) for continuous monitoring; 66% (57-75%) for continuous bCPAP without disruptions; 46% (36-55%) for avoidance of oral feeding while on bCPAP. Among children receiving bCPAP, 9 (10%) experienced an aspiration event, 1 (2.2%) experienced a pneumothorax; 19 (22%) experienced bCPAP treatment failure. One child (1.1%) died; 6 (6.8%) required respiratory support escalation; 14 (16%) left against medical advice. We identified several gaps in bCPAP reach and fidelity. These may be modifiable by individual-and team-targeted strategies to reduce bCPAP-related complications and pneumonia-related child deaths.