Search for a command to run...
Abstract Hierarchy in the brain emerges across spatial and temporal scales, enabling transformations from rapid sensory encoding to sustained cognitive control. Hierarchical gradients are well established in sensory systems. In contrast, the hierarchical organization of the primate motor cortex remains debated, partly due to its agranular architecture and the absence of clear laminar input-output projections, that obscures the distinction between feedforward and feedback pathways. In particular, the relative hierarchical position of the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and the primary motor cortex (M1) cannot be resolved from anatomy alone. To investigate their relative organization, we here adopted a multimodal approach using intrinsic timescales derived from both single-unit spiking activity (SUA) and local field potentials (LFPs) in macaques performing a delayed-match-to-sample reaching task. We found convergent evidence for inter-areal temporal hierarchy, with longer spiking timescales and smaller LFP aperiodic spectral exponents in M1. Across cortical depth, however, temporal organization depended on signal modality. LFP spectral exponents were significantly smaller in deep than superficial layers in both areas, and LFP-autocorrelation timescales were longer in deep layers in M1. In contrast, spiking activity did not show significant laminar differences in intrinsic timescales. Functionally, neurons with longer timescales exhibited more stable representations of the planned movement direction during motor preparation in PMd and slower temporal evolution of movement encoding during execution in both areas. In conclusion, multimodal temporal measures converge on the same hierarchical organization across these two motor areas, with M1 placed higher than PMd. Our study provides the first characterization of intrinsic spiking timescales across cortical layers in any cortical area and shows that laminar temporal organization depends on the neural signal analyzed. This divergence likely reflects their distinct physiological origins. Spikes capture neuronal output, whereas LFPs primarily reflect synaptic and dendritic population activity, potentially integrating differential contributions from apical and basal dendritic inputs.