Are Linear Cephalometric Measurements Interpreted Equally Across Birth Cohorts? Cross-Sectional Cephalometric Study

Background/Objectives: This study evaluated whether linear cephalometric measurements show systematic differences in their central values across birth cohort groups in adults from a clinical population and analyzed the implications of these differences for clinical interpretation when norms and clinical deviations are used as a reference framework. Methods: A cross-sectional observational analytical study was conducted based on 604 lateral cephalometric radiographs of adult patients. Eleven linear cephalometric measurements were obtained and compared across predefined birth cohort groups (<1980, 1980–1989, and 1990–1999) using robust estimators of central tendency through median regression models adjusted for sex, age group, and sagittal skeletal classification. Results: Several linear cephalometric measurements revealed different central values between the birth cohorts, even after adjusting for relevant covariates. Cranial length, anterior cranial base length, posterior facial height, and posterior cranial base length had lower adjusted median values in the 1990–1999 cohort than in the <1980 cohort. The effective maxillary length and maxillary length also differed between cohorts. Mandibular measurements, including mandibular length, corpus length, and ramus height, showed the largest adjusted median contrasts between cohorts. These cohort-associated differences were not uniform across all measurements. Conclusions: Routinely used linear cephalometric measurements present different central values across adult birth cohort groups under comparable clinical conditions. The relative position of a cephalometric value within its reference distribution may vary by birth cohort. This suggests that using fixed reference means and standard deviations could lead to systematic misestimation in adults from various birth cohorts. Cohort-aware interpretation is valuable in routine cephalometric assessments.