HPV Detection in Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Emerging Molecular Approaches

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has emerged as a biologically distinct entity, typically affecting younger, non-smoking patients and showing improved survival compared to HPV-negative tumors. Accurate HPV status determination is essential for correct staging, prognostic assessment, and treatment de-escalation. Despite advances, substantial variability persists among diagnostic methods and clinical workflows. A narrative review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 2025. Studies addressing HPV detection techniques in OPSCC—including p16^INK4a^ immunohistochemistry (IHC), HPV DNA and RNA assays, liquid biopsy approaches, and computational surrogates—were critically analyzed regarding diagnostic accuracy, clinical applicability, and emerging innovations. Tissue-based assays remain the diagnostic reference standard. p16 IHC provides high sensitivity but limited specificity and should be confirmed with nucleic acid-based methods such as DNA PCR, in situ hybridization (ISH), or E6/E7 mRNA detection. Combined or “orthogonal” testing minimizes discordance and refines risk stratification. Liquid biopsy detection of circulating HPV DNA using droplet digital PCR or next-generation sequencing has shown high sensitivity and specificity in cohorts of patients with HPV-associated OPSCC, supporting its potential role as a complementary biomarker for treatment monitoring and surveillance. However, circulating HPV DNA alone does not unequivocally identify the anatomic source of HPV DNA and should be interpreted together with clinical, radiologic, and tissue-based findings. Oral rinse and saliva assays show moderate diagnostic performance, while artificial intelligence-based radiomic and histopathologic models are emerging as complementary tools. Reliable HPV attribution in OPSCC requires a multimodal diagnostic strategy integrating p16 IHC, molecular confirmation, and ctHPV-DNA monitoring. Methodological standardization and prospective validation are essential to implement precision-guided, cost-effective workflows in routine clinical practice.