Integrated Optimization for Reducing Injection Molding Defects in Charcoal Canisters

This study presents an integrated optimization framework that combines the Design of Experiments (DOE) approach with Machine Learning (ML) techniques to minimize defects in the injection molding of Fuel Vapor Charcoal Canisters. The research focuses on five critical process parameters—melt temperature, mold temperature, filling time, pressure holding time, and pure cooling time—whose combined influence on major molding defects (warpage, shrinkage, shear stress, residual stress, and short shots) was systematically investigated. A Taguchi L25 orthogonal array was employed to structure the experiments and identify the optimal parameter levels through signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio analysis using the “smaller-the-better” quality criterion. The Taguchi results revealed that pressure holding time was the most influential factor, followed by mold temperature and melt temperature. Simulation results from SolidWorks Plastics confirmed the reduction in major defects under the optimized settings. To further validate and generalize the DOE findings, a Random Forest regression model was trained on the same dataset to capture nonlinear interactions between parameters. The model achieved an average RMSE of 2.451 ± 0.591 in five-fold cross-validation, demonstrating strong predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis indicated that pressure holding time accounted for approximately 77.5% of the variance in the defect index, reaffirming its dominant role. A 3D response surface of the global parameter space (mold temperature vs. pressure holding time) revealed a distinct minimum defect region, consistent with the DOE-optimized settings. The Taguchi analysis identified the optimal parameter settings as Melt Temperature at Level 2, Mould Temperature at Level 3, Filling Time at Level 4, Pressure Holding Time at Level 5, and Pure Cooling Time at Level 4, which collectively produced the highest S/N ratios and the lowest overall defect index. The overall discrepancy between DOE and ML predictions was only 12.5%, confirming methodological consistency. The integration of DOE and ML not only enhances parameter interpretability and defect prediction accuracy but also provides a scalable, data-driven approach for intelligent process control and quality assurance in automotive injection molding.