Perceived Factors Influencing Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Risk Assessment and Management: A Cross-Sectional Survey with Service Users and Professionals

Abstract Background Mental health services are shifting towards person-centred care based on collaboration and shared decision making. Yet evidence indicates that these approaches may not be consistently happening in the assessment and management of risk or safety. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey to examine perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and management with people living with severe mental illness. Questionnaire development and data analysis were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, a psychological framework used to identify and understand factors influencing behaviour change. Items were rated on a 5 int Likert scale. In total, 243 service users and mental health professionals completed the survey. Results Most service users reported that risk or safety had been discussed with them, but only half felt involved in the risk assessment or management process. Two thirds reported not receiving a copy of their risk assessment or management plan. Service users strongly agreed that communication with professionals about risk and safety requires improvement, and that risk is a difficult and emotive topic to discuss. Professionals reported high motivation to involve service users but identified time constraints and service user related factors as key barriers. Principal component analysis identified four components: (1) motivation; (2) social influences and memory/decision making; (3) beliefs about consequences; and (4) team, environment and training factors. More experienced professionals reported fewer negative beliefs about consequences, such as concerns about causing distress or disengagement. Conclusion Findings highlight the need for clearer communication, organisational support and targeted training to enhance shared decision-making in risk assessment and management practices.