Search for a command to run...
As part of Work Package 2, AspirE team members carried out content analysis of six mobility policies at the European Union (EU) and Member-State levels as well as at the country level in the Asian context involving five states. The policy fields covered are as follows: labour migration, tourism, family reunification, student migration, investment and the EU’s freedom of movement. The beginnings of Philippines-Europe migration corridor started in the 1970s, alongside the start of the more organised and state-facilitated labour migration of Filipino workers to oil-rich countries in the Gulf region. Comparatively, migration from the Philippines to Europe was of smaller scale and was highly feminised, comprised mainly of the labour migration of women who entered the domestic work and care sector in destination countries. Marriage migration further contributed to the participation of women in Filipino migration to Europe. This report carried out a content analysis of the migration/mobility policies of the Philippines as an origin country, and on the destination side, it considered the policies of three European countries: Italy, an established and major destination of Filipinos in Europe; Germany, also an established destination but emerging in actively recruiting Filipino workers; and Czechia, a new and growing destination of Filipino workers. As an origin country, the Philippines has measures and requirements in place to promote the legal departure of international migrants and travellers out of the country. A review of the destination countries’ policies on labour migration, marriage and family reunification, student migration, and tourism reveal the onus on applicants to provide various documents to support their claims about education, skills, and financial capacity, among others, to secure a visa to enter the intended destination country. In general, long-term visas provide aspiring migrants with the possibility to convert their status from one visa category to another, although this is not the same in all three countries. Short-term visas are more restrictive as they do not offer the possibility to convert to another migrant status. The report suggests that the trend towards more flexible conditions to meet the demand for workers in the three countries need to consider not just migrants’ aspirations and behaviours, but also the voices of other stakeholders, and the impact of destination countries’ migration policies on origin countries.