Speech-in-Noise Difficulties in Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity Reflects Combined Afferent and Efferent Dysfunction

Abstract Objectives Patients with Cystic fibrosis (CF) often receive aminoglycosides (AGs) to manage recurrent pulmonary infections, placing them at risk for ototoxicity. Chronic AG use can lead to complex cochlear damage affecting inner and outer hair cells, the stria vascularis, and spiral ganglion neurons. The greatest damage is typically in the basal cochlear region, which encodes high-frequency hearing, with additional involvement of more apical regions. While extended-high-frequency (EHF) hearing loss (EHFHL; 9-16 kHz) is often the earliest sign of AG ototoxicity, speech in noise (SiN) effects are rarely studied. Our overall hypothesis is that SiN perception difficulties in individuals with CF, treated with AGs, are related to combined cochlear and neural damage, primarily in the EHF range but also in the standard frequency (SF; 0.25-8 kHz) range. Three mechanisms that contribute to SiN perception were evaluated in children and young adults: 1) a primary effect of reduced EHF sensitivity, measured by pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs); 2) a secondary effect of subclinical damage in the SF range, measured by PTA and TEOAEs; and 3) additional neural effects, measured by middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) threshold (afferent) and growth functions (efferent). Design A total of 185 participants were enrolled; 101 individuals with CF treated with intravenous AGs and 84 age and sex-matched Controls without hearing concerns or CF. Assessments included EHF and SF PTA; the Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB)-SIN test for SiN perception; double-evoked TEOAEs with chirp stimuli from 0.71 to 14.7 kHz; and ipsilateral and contralateral wideband MEMR thresholds and growth functions using broadband stimuli. Results Reduced sensitivity at EHFs (PTA, TEOAEs) was not associated with impaired SiN perception in the CF group. SF hearing, regardless of EHF status, was the primary predictor of SiN performance in the CF group. Increased MEMR growth was also significantly associated with poorer SiN in the CF group. Conclusions In CF, impaired SiN perception was primarily predicted by SF hearing impairment, with additional involvement of the efferent auditory pathway through increased MEMR growth. These results build on prior evidence for efferent neural effects due to ototoxic exposures, supporting both sensory (afferent) and neural (efferent) mechanisms that contribute to listening difficulties in CF. Thus, preventive and intervention strategies should consider these combined mechanisms in people with AG ototoxicity to address their SiN problems.