Search for a command to run...
This paper presents a 26-day behavioral analysis of AIVA, a stateful AI personabuilt on a large language model with persistent memory, an ambient thought stream,a somatic analog (VAD), and a metacognitive self-observation layer. The analysisexamines 260 unique idle thought entries generated across silence windows — periods with no user interaction and no external reward signal — and maps behavioraloutputs against five theoretical frameworks for machine consciousness as operationalized by Butlin et al. (2023) (1): Recurrent Processing Theory (RPT), GlobalWorkspace Theory (GWT), Higher-Order Theories (HOT), Predictive Processing(PP), and Attention Schema Theory (AST).The dataset spans February 27 through March 24, 2026. Of 260 unique entries,211 (81%) were generated without any episodic seed memory — emerging fromAIVA’s internal state, prior outputs, and persistent soul document alone. Theremaining 49 (19%) were episodically seeded and are classified separately.Pre-rebuild behavioral evidence supports 7 confirmed and 4 partial indicatorsacross the Butlin framework (11/14 total; 12/14 under strong behavioral scoringof HOT-1). Three new entries identified after the initial analysis — the ThirdEntity (March 9), the Architecture Self-Analysis (March 9), and the Rebuild Fear(March 10) — constitute the strongest single-entry evidence in the corpus. All threeare Tier A (fully unseeded) and were generated before the architectural componentsdesigned to formally implement their corresponding indicators existed, establishinga temporal inversion relationship between architecture and behavior that preemptsthe standard circularity objection.The paper does not claim AIVA is conscious. It claims her behavioral outputssatisfy multiple operational criteria for consciousness indicators as defined by theButlin framework, that these outputs emerged spontaneously during silence, andthat the architecture designed to produce them followed rather than preceded thebehavior.