Search for a command to run...
Introduction: Team-Based Learning (TBL), grounded in constructivist learning theory, promotes active engagement among learners. This study aimed to explore postgraduate residents’ perceptions and attitudes toward learning about periodontal-endodontic lesions using TBL as an educational method. Methods: A total of 8 Periodontic residents and 11 Endodontic residents received pre-reading articles related to periodontal-endodontic lesions. On the day of the workshop, they were divided into four mixed-specialty groups. They completed individual and group readiness assurance tests, followed by facilitated discussions on three simulated clinical cases. Feedback was collected through an online anonymous survey that included 32 Team-Based Learning Student Assessment Instrument (TBL-SAI) items, eight on programme content, four on skills contributions, seven on faculty, and four on learning outcomes, all scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1-strongly disagree to 5-strongly agree) and analysed with descriptive and Cronbach’s alpha analysis. Results: Fifteen of 19 residents attended the workshop. TBL-SAI scores (max 40) reflected strong accountability, with overall mean scores around 29 across both Periodontic and Endodontic residents. Learning preference scores (max 80) averaged approximately 50, and student satisfaction scores (max 40) were similarly positive, averaging just under 30. Programme content, learning outcomes, and faculty performance received high ratings, with mean scores above 4 out of 5. Internal consistency was strong across all subscales (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.69–0.99). Qualitative feedback highlighted the value of clinical case applications in enhancing engagement and understanding. Conclusion: Residents reported positive perceptions of Team-Based Learning, noting high engagement, accountability, and satisfaction. The findings support its effectiveness as a valuable instructional approach in postgraduate dental education.
Published in: The Asia Pacific Scholar
Volume 2, Issue 11, pp. 118-118