Search for a command to run...
Abstract Quantifying the natal kick distribution of pulsars is essential for understanding supernova physics and binary evolution, yet measurements are historically limited by the lack of radial velocity data. Most previous studies rely on transverse velocities under the assumption of spatial isotropy. In this work, we reconstruct the intrinsic three-dimensional (3D) velocity distribution for a curated sample of 18 pulsars by explicitly incorporating the observational constraint of spin–velocity alignment. Using a hierarchical Bayesian framework that accounts for measurement uncertainties, we compare nine candidate velocity distribution models. We find that a gamma distribution provides an adequate description of the inferred 3D velocities; however, the modest Bayes factor (1.65 relative to a single Maxwellian model) indicates that the current data lack sufficient resolving power to discriminate decisively among the models considered. The gamma model is characterized by a peak velocity of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>23</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>84</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>67</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> km s −1 . The reconstructed 3D velocities under alignment are systematically lower than those inferred under isotropy, indicating that projection effects can bias individual kick estimates to be high, while leaving the overall population scale largely unchanged within uncertainties. A complementary analysis of 465 pulsars with transverse velocity estimates favors a log-normal distribution for the full sample, while isolated young pulsars remain consistent with a gamma-like profile. Our results underscore the importance of geometric assumptions in population inference and highlight the need for larger samples with improved distance and spin-axis measurements to place tighter constraints on natal kick physics.
Published in: The Astrophysical Journal
Volume 1000, Issue 2, pp. 288-288