Search for a command to run...
After several critical reports by the Federal Audit Office on the implementation of the energy transition followed a cost estimation of €13.3 trillion by the Scientific Service of the German Bundestag. Political “lack of alternatives” and needed CO2 reduction led to an uncoordinated activism. The resulting promotion of state-funded NGOs and their lobbying pressure ultimately prevented a clear and stringent program management. The lack of scientific understanding regarding the importance of thermodynamic potential for demand-oriented supply failed to recognize a needed energy storage. Nature’s carbon cycle and the potential generation from CO2 and H2O to hydrocarbons were ignored, however this is the solution. The foreseeable financial collapse of the entire concept lies in the thermodynamically superfluous mandatory energy savings and the infrastructure rebuilding to avoid CO2 emissions. However, the use of renewable gaseous hydrocarbons as energy storage enables the continued use of the existing natural gas infrastructure and only requires recirculation of the raw material CO2 without further investments. The results already available today for the renewable feed-in proof the advantages of a solar-powered carbon cycle economy by the rising high costs of thCost Efficient e extensive regulatory measures for stabilizing the European grid. Finally the carbon cycle economy could save around €10 trillion and operating costs comparable to LNG.