Search for a command to run...
This paper reviews the development of the cash flow statement reporting in India and compares account standard 3 (AS 3) and Indian Accounting Standard 7 (Ind AS 7). The financial statements prepared according to the traditional accrual basis accounting usually do not provide the liquidity position of a firm thus making it important to consider the implementation of cash flow statements as an important element of financial reporting. The study is both descriptive and analytical based on secondary data of accounting standards, regulatory publications, and academic literature. It compares the conceptual framework, classification of cash flows, disclosure requirements and reporting practices of the two standards. Although the AS 3 offers a more simplified structure of categorizing cash flows in terms of operating, investing, and financing activities, Ind AS 7 presents a more detailed approach that is based on principles and is in line with international standards (IAS 7). The results show that Ind AS 7 increases transparency, comparability, and reliability of financial reporting in terms of high levels of disclosure and wide classifications of items like interest, dividends, and foreign currency cash flows. It enhances corporate governance as well and helps in making better decisions on behalf of the stakeholders, such as investors, creditors and regulators. Nonetheless, the change between AS 3 and Ind AS 7 has the following implementation issues: more complexity, use of professional judgment, and technical skills. It finds that transition to Ind AS 7 is a major move in ensuring that Indian financial reporting is in line with the international practice hence enhancing the quality and credibility of financial reporting. It highlights that regulatory assistance, professional training and improvements of the system are needed in order to facilitate implementation. Keywords- Cash Flow Statements, AS 3, Ind AS 7, Financial Statements and Corporate Governance
Published in: International Journal of Creative and Open Research in Engineering and Management
Volume 02, Issue 03, pp. 1-17