Reaction time analysis as a method of studying cognitive conflict in mental models

<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Context and relevance.</strong>.One of the rapidly developing directions in contemporary cognitive psychology is the study of mental models, understood as structured sets of beliefs underlying thinking and decision-making. <strong>Objective.</strong> The aim of this article is to review experimental studies of mental models that employ the reaction time analysisand to develop a framework for preparing, designing, and conducting studies using this method in new domains. <strong>Methods and materials.</strong> The paper presents an analytical review of key experimental studies in which reaction time is used as an indicator of cognitive processing. Particular attention is paid to the cognitive conflict between intuitive and scientific knowledge. This conflict manifests itself in increased reaction times and a higher number of errors when participants evaluate incongruent statements. <strong>Results.</strong> The review examines key factors influencing the resolution of this conflict, including level of education, scientific expertise, age, cognitive reflection, and everyday perceptual experience. Major experimental effects related to the coexistence of intuitive and scientific knowledge are described, including their evolutionary, cultural, and individual sources. The paper also discusses theoretical explanations for the persistence of intuitive beliefs and the mechanisms of cognitive control that suppress them. In addition, a research plan is proposed that includes stages of stimulus preparation, experimental procedure, and data analysis. <strong>Conclusions.</strong> The results highlight the importance of reaction time analysis as a method for studying the coexistence of intuitive and scientific knowledge and open new prospects for research within dual-process theories.</p> <div class="XTranslate" style="all: unset;"></div>