Search for a command to run...
Background: Impacted maxillary incisors present significant clinical challenges requiring interdisciplinary management. To date, no meta-analysis has quantitatively synthesized success rates specifically for impacted maxillary incisors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled success rate of orthodontic traction for impacted maxillary incisors and identify factors influencing outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (January 2011 - March 5, 2026). Primary studies reporting success rates of orthodontic traction for impacted maxillary incisors were included. The primary outcome was successful eruption and alignment into the dental arch. Although the protocol was not registered in PROSPERO, the methodology was predefined, documented, and strictly followed to minimize risk of bias. Pooled success rates were calculated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method) with R software (meta package). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. Quality assessment employed ROBINS-I. Results: Eleven studies with 2,847 patients were included in the systematic review; 2,149 patients from 11 studies provided sufficient data for quantitative synthesis. The pooled success rate was 82.3% (95% CI: 78.6-86.0%), with a prediction interval ranging from 70% to 91%. Considerable heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 78%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that younger age (<14 years) was associated with significantly higher success rates (88.4% vs. 78.2%, p = 0.01). Mild impaction depth (<5mm) was associated with higher success rates (89.2% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.02). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test, p = 0.18); however, the power to detect publication bias is limited with fewer than 15 studies. Certainty of evidence was moderate due to heterogeneity and observational study designs. Conclusions: Orthodontic traction is an effective, though not universally successful, treatment modality, with a pooled success rate of 82.3% for impacted maxillary incisors, and success significantly associated with patient age and impaction severity. Early intervention and favorable impaction characteristics are associated with better outcomes