Navigating the Juror Role in Maltese Criminal Trials: a Narrative Inquiry

Abstract Research into the juror role highlights the demanding nature of jury service, requiring individuals to adapt to unfamiliar legal settings, emotional strain, and the burden of decision-making. This paper explores narratives of individuals who served in Maltese criminal trials, aiming to understand how they assumed and negotiated the role. Six former jurors participated in semi-structured interviews, and data was analysed through narrative inquiry using Dewey’s three-dimensional model of experience, alongside social constructionist role theories. Findings reveal that while participants recognised the gravity of their responsibilities, they faced challenges like limited agency and questionable audience segregation. Adopting the role involved ambiguous transitions, with pre-trial expectations and prior knowledge sometimes clashing with courtroom realities. Relinquishing the role post-trial evoked both relief and disorientation. Participants evaluated the performances of other courtroom figures, with these interactions shaping their experience. The study underscores the complexity of the juror role and offers recommendations for future research.