Search for a command to run...
The article is devoted to the study of managing interpersonal conflicts in printing companies as a key issue of modern management. The printing industry is characterized by high dynamics, strict production deadlines, significant financial risks, and constant interaction among various professional groups – editors, designers, technologists, marketers, and clients. Under such conditions, conflicts arise regularly and may have both constructive and destructive effects. Traditional approaches, which were largely limited to “firefighting” or suppressing disputes, have proven insufficiently effective, as they fail to take into account the psychological aspects of interaction, the emotional responses of participants, and the systemic causes of recurring conflicts. The purpose of the study is to develop and substantiate a system for managing interpersonal conflicts in printing companies that integrates contemporary psychological, communication, and organizational management methods. The methodological framework is based on systemic, cognitive-behavioral, and human-centered approaches, which makes it possible to integrate psychological, organizational, and economic tools into a unified management model. The study employs a comparative analysis of modern methods, including the “conflict as a resource” strategy (Positive Conflict), interest-based negotiations (Harvard Negotiation Project), the cognitive-behavioral approach, EQ management, facilitation, coaching, and nonviolent communication. The article synthesizes the key competencies of a manager that directly affect the economic efficiency of an enterprise. These competencies are transformed into tangible benefits for the company – from reducing costs and downtime to improving product quality and strengthening client trust. In particular, competencies related to working with clients and contractors generate the greatest economic effect, whereas facilitation and the “conflict as a resource” strategy ensure strategic development and innovation. Conflict prevention through communication is also essential, as it promotes process transparency and reduces the number of crisis situations. The practical orientation of the study is realized through examples of printing projects in which conflicts arise due to differing professional perspectives, tight deadlines, and financial risks. It is demonstrated how the application of brainstorming, clarifying questions, collaborative modelling, or interest-based negotiations makes it possible to transform disputes into a source of innovative solutions. This proves that conflict can be not only a point of risk but also a point of growth for a company, stimulating creativity, competence development, and the formation of a culture of trust. In summary, the article argues that effective management of interpersonal conflicts in printing companies should be multi-level: from emotional stabilization to the systemic elimination of root causes, from interest-based negotiations to using conflict as a resource for innovation. The proposed model provides a dual outcome: economic benefits in the short term and strategic value in the long term – namely, the development of a culture of collaboration, innovation, and professional maturity within the team.
Published in: Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences
Volume 352, Issue 2, pp. 69-83